emileclarkb/hammer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

why not include the lhs in pretty-printed reduce entries?

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Sven M. Hallberg 2013-06-12 16:48:59 +02:00
parent 4b5a936667
commit ddfd3796a7
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
src/backends/lalr.c
View file

@ -836,15 +836,17 @@ void pprint_lraction(FILE *f, const HCFGrammar *g, const HLRAction *action)
if(action->type == HLR_SHIFT) {
fprintf(f, "s%lu", action->nextstate);
} else {
fputs("r(", f);
h_pprint_symbol(f, g, action->production.lhs);
fputs(" -> ", f);
#ifdef NDEBUG
// if we can't print the production, at least print its length
fprintf(f, "r[%lu]", action->production.length);
fprintf(f, "[%lu]", action->production.length);
#else
fputs("r(", f);
HCFSequence seq = {action->production.rhs};
h_pprint_sequence(f, g, &seq);
fputc(')', f);
#endif
fputc(')', f);
}
}